The info shown was accumulated in the framework from greater browse projects, which contains a detailed sociodemographic and you can dating comparison, along with other balances from inside the extent out of personal relationship

Depending on the overall duration of the partnership, the average, in many years, towards the various other statuses demonstrated are, respectively: dos.89 (SD = dos.27); 4.94 (SD = 2.97), one another teams varying anywhere between 6 months and you may eleven several years of dating; eight.76 (SD = 4.01), anywhere between two and you may 19 decades; and you may (SD = cuatro.82), ranging from below a-year and 31 many years. 8%) and you may lived having family relations, when you find yourself those managing the people were mainly doing work anybody (69.2%), of which 53% got college otherwise postgraduate degree. Of one’s formal commitment players, 67% got school or post-graduate stages, where 89.8% have been working, 2% resigned and you may 8.2% out of work. The working disease towards the partnered participants try similar: 89.5% was in fact performing, 2.9% were retired and six.3% have been underemployed, and step one.3% called another work standing. Within this category, 62.5% of the participants got college or postgraduate degree.

Personal connection are examined with respect to the Portuguese type (Table step 1) of your own faster brand of the brand new Hard work Scale (Stanley, 1986), that has been interpreted with respect to the after the Fontana escort twitter interpretation and you may retroversion strategies: once permission gotten of the journalist, the first level is interpreted from the two experts in industry, both these translations was in fact subjected to retroversion from the one or two experts, one to bilingual and another experienced in the aid of the fresh English language; finally, for every single version try compared to the brand-new size, going for the usage this new terminology and you will factors which have better proximity to it. New Portuguese version ergo contained the fresh 14 modern factors and you may the same answer scale and you can was titled, immediately following deliberation by cluster, the private Connection Size (‘Escala de Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). Towards the finally stage of your translation procedure, the brand new tool is actually given to three people towards the aim of guaranteeing the fresh new adequateness of the code additionally the unambiguous understanding of what exactly, which have been chatted about into participants shortly after application of the latest survey. Because there have been no comments claiming or even, stuff remained an identical.

Through an up-date of one’s brand spanking new Davis (1996, quoted for the Lind, 2008) level, which appliance is intended to measure dating high quality impact, with the hope one to, with respect to the theoretic presumptions, both bills usually seriously associate

Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.